Sponsored

Money

Can You Expect to Double Your Money In 10 Years?

Prospects seem pretty good, until you do the real math


(This article originally appeared on the website of the American Institute for Economic Research.)

Sometimes when I do a back-of-the-napkin estimate about how much I’ll have saved in the future, I’ll use a handy formula known as the “rule of 72.” This rule says that if you divide 72 by your rate of return, the resulting number is roughly how many years it will take your money to double.

For example, if I expect returns of 7 percent a year, I would expect my money to double in about 10 years (72 / 7 = 10.3 years).

From January 2000 through December 2009, not only would you have failed to double your money, you actually would have lost money.

I was recently talking to an adviser who made a confident statement that he expected to double his clients’ money every 10 years. Based on the rule of 72, this suggests that he thinks he can return an average of 7.2 percent per year over the next 10 years.

Historically, the S&P 500 has returned almost 10 percent per year, so this statement doesn’t seem outlandish. But let’s dive a little deeper and see how this “double your money” idea plays out in the real world.

Looking at Stock Returns Only

Using annual data since 1926 for the S&P 500, we have 81 possible 10-year periods. If you were to invest 100 percent in the S&P 500, there would have been 59 of these 10-year periods during when you would have doubled your money. This is a pretty good success rate (about 73 percent), but nowhere near a guarantee.

Take, for instance, the period from January 2000 through December 2009. During this period, not only would you have failed to double your money, you actually would have lost money. On the other hand, the 10-year period ending in 1959 saw stock returns of over 600 percent. Suffice it to say, the range of possible outcomes is broad.

Of course responsible advisers realize that a 100 percent stock portfolio is rarely appropriate, even for the most risk-tolerant investors. So what happens when we add a little diversification?

Returns With a Diversified Portfolio

I then looked back at returns for a diversified portfolio comprised of 60 percent stocks (S&P 500) and 40 percent bonds (20 percent in long-term corporate bonds and 20 percent in five-year U.S. Treasuries). The good news is that this portfolio would have mitigated the risk of that lousy 2000 through 2009 decade — you would have made about 36 percent, instead of losing almost 8 percent.

But there is no free lunch.

While diversification lowers your risk, with this 60/40 portfolio, there were even fewer 10-year periods when you would have doubled your money. Of the 81 possible periods, this portfolio would have doubled your money in only 52 of them (64 percent). Still not a bad rate of success, but this doesn’t yet account for any fees.

A Diversified Portfolio After Subtracting Fund Fees

Mutual funds, index funds, and Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are subject to fees, often listed as “expense ratios.” The fees on ETFs using simple index funds can be low, ranging from 0.05 percent to about 0.30 percent. The fees on actively managed funds tend to be higher, often ranging from 0.50 to above 1 percent. I have no idea which funds the adviser in question uses, but let’s assume he’s chosen a mix of funds and ETFs with average fees of 0.50 percent.

After accounting for these fees, out of 81 possible historical 10-year periods, we’re down to 46 (57 percent) that would have doubled your money. Oh wait, doesn’t the adviser charge fees too?

A Diversified Portfolio After Fund and Adviser Fees

I’m betting the adviser didn’t account for his own fees in his calculation of doubling up every 10 years. Let’s add in a lower-than-average adviser fee of 0.75 percent (many adviser fees start at 1 percent or above).

After accounting for fund fees and adviser fees, our historical 60/40 portfolio doubles every 10 years in only 41 of 81 cases (51 percent). Things are now looking a little less certain. And we’ve yet to look at the taxes.

A Diversified Portfolio After Fees and Taxes

Capital gains taxes are 15 percent for most people; there may be other taxes paid during the course of the 10 years, but we’ll just assume this base 15 percent rate. The investor may not actually have to pay these taxes during the period, but if he wants to use the money for something in 10 years, he’ll need to sell his investments and come up with the capital gains taxes.

Accounting for these potential taxes, the number of periods where you could have doubled your money now falls to 35 (or 43 percent of them). And this still fails to account for the purchasing power of the portfolio — that is, inflation.

Can You Expect to Double Your Money in 10 Years chart embed

A Diversified Portfolio After Fees, Taxes and Inflation

If you doubled your money during the late 1970s and early 1980s, when prices of goods and services were skyrocketing, you barely kept up with inflation. So doubling your money wouldn’t have gotten you anywhere in terms of what you could do with it.

For example, from 1974 through 1983, our diversified portfolio after fees and taxes would have more than doubled, but after accounting for price increases, the value of the portfolio would have actually been about 5 percent less than at the beginning of the period. Translation: you’d be worse off financially.

So if we account for inflation in our historical examples, we now drop to just 10 of 81 periods (12 percent) during which you could have truly doubled your money. Suddenly, this adviser’s promise is looking doubtful, to say the least.

My Conclusion

Anyone promising to double your money in 10 years may be using a back-of-the-napkin estimate instead of a rigorous analysis accounting for fees and inflation.

Will your money double in 10 years? Maybe, but it’s far from a guarantee.

Instead of focusing on what you may or may not return over the next 10 years, it may be wise to focus on controlling what you can — by minimizing expenses, making tax-efficient investment allocations and diversifying.

By Luke Delorme
Luke Delorme is a Research Fellow at the American Institute for Economic Research with a focus in retirement research, investment economics, and personal finance. He has been recently published in the Journal of Financial Planning, AAII Journal, and will publish an article on Social Security claiming in the Spring 2016 Retirement Management Journal. He worked previously at the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, Analysis Group, and State Street Global Markets.

Next Avenue brings you stories that are inspiring and change lives. We know that because we hear it from our readers every single day. One reader says,

"Every time I read a post, I feel like I'm able to take a single, clear lesson away from it, which is why I think it's so great."

Your generous donation will help us continue to bring you the information you care about. What story will you help make possible?

Sponsored

HideShow Comments

Sponsored

Sponsored